Day 6 – Capitalism

Can I limit my definition and concerns about capitalism to only 500 words? Let’s find out!

I was listening to a podcast last week that I will not name; just using this as a jumping-off point. The hosts are generally liberal or left-leaning, and the normal topic of the show is the tech industry, but because of a reader question they were talking about tech CEOs and what they could do to push back against things like anti-labor practices, wealth inequality, and resource exploitation. In other words, the hosts were talking about capitalism, especially as it’s practiced in the early 21st century here in America and the world.

And one of the hosts said that they like capitalism. Specifically they said they like some parts of capitalism, some parts of socialism, but that neither one of them is the complete picture of how to organize society.

And that struck me as just dumb. It’s that whole “moderate” view where you try to thread the needle so you don’t take any particular stance. And my one thought was, how does this person define capitalism? Because by my understanding, there ain’t nothing good about capitalism in the basic idea. I would love to ask this person for their definition, but that would probalby just end up in an argument, and generally I like this person and their tech and social opinions.

Instead, here’s my baseline understanding of capitalism, and how it’s been running lately. The base idea of capitalism is that it’s good to accumulate capital. Capital is whatever tangible goods, objects, factories, or labor needed to make things people need. Capital is classically the machines and factories used to manufacture goods, but that ignores the very real labor that the workers in that factory also provide. The labor is also capital, human capital.

Folks with the most capital are called capitalists. We generally don’t examine, at least outside of lefty circles, what or how those capitalists accumulated their capital. How did they have the money to buy or have factories built? My inclination is that most of them inherited it, and then through the process of underpaying for the labor and overpricing the output, kept accumulating profits that gave them even more capital.

Because that’s the ethical failing, as I see it. Labor will always produce a surplus. A leftist thinks that the laborer should retain most if not all of that surplus. A capitalist, though, claims to own that surplus because they own the factory. To my mind, that’s a tautology. The factory was itself built by labor, and labor was underpaid for that construction, because the capitalist retains ownership of the property.

Capitalists, are, definitionally, profit extractors. Rent-seekers. That’s how they accumulate capital.

Let’s briefly touch on what capitalism is not. It’s not the concept of money, or markets, or buying and selling. All of those things existed before Adam Smith tried to define a new economic model. Capitalism is also not the idea of profit; that, too, existed previously in human history. Funnily enough, excessive profits was seen as a negative, nearly a sin, definitely a moral failing. It’s just that it was called usury (and to be quite honest, applied in a very discriminatory and racist way.)

I’d love to bring back the accusation of usury, but I’d apply that to billionaires. Are you with me?

The Rumsfeld Doctrine

Back in the mists of time there was a website called Geeks Against Bush, founded by friends and me, trying to write about politics from a liberal (for me at least not yet “leftist”) but techie point of view. I wrote a lot of posts there, but sometime after Obama got elected, Caleb stopped renewing the domain, and the posts all fell off the internet. But the one I am most proud of was my post about then-Defense-Secretary Donald Rumsfeld’s cynical and heartless military doctrine.

I’m in the process of going back over my backlog and updating the links, and I managed to find the text of my original post about The Rumsfeld Doctrine on the Wayback Machine. Below you can find the full text.

The links below may or may not work, though, as of this posting. I’ll need to update them, I’m sure.

Nothing is ever really gone on the internet, after all.

More

Past as prologue

In 1985, I was 20 years old.

Of all the factors that our society considered the hallmarks of adulthood, I had some but not others. No job, no car, unable to drink alcohol legally, still living with my parents. Yet I could vote, I had a steady, long-term girlfriend, whom I had met in high school. I was not a virgin. And I could think.

I knew that I was a citizen of the United States, and that the country and the leadership of my county were locked in a deadly enmity with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic, and that the weapon of choice for expressing that animosity was the nuclear bomb. Both my country and the enemy had access to nukes; horrible weapons that did not just destroy the target, large targets, targets the size of large cities, but which also rendered the targets uninhabitable for decades, centuries, and caused deformations and illness in any victim unlucky enough to have survived the initial blast.

And both sides didn’t just have one or two or a dozen of these bombs. They had hundreds. More than were necessary to merely “win” a “war”. Enough to wipe each other out, and every ally, and everyone else, all over the world.

The strategy being pursued by my government, and the enemy (my government told me), for prevailing over the enemy was astonishingly insane: the strategy was to build more and more of these bombs, in order to scare the other side into not using their own bombs.

The madness that you and I now live under, the madness that caused men in caves to fly a jetliner full of innocents into large buildings, and the madness that caused our country’s leadership to respond by invading a country they despised but had not direct connection to the attack of the men in caves, is almost understandable compared to my memories of the Cold War. Almost.

But back in 1985, it was such a horrible dark cloud hanging over the heads of all Americans that our responses were, by and large, anger. Punk rock is hard to define, but for me it will always include an anti-authoritarian, cynical, and political viewpoint, along with the feeling that, if we’re all going to die we might as well have fun. And punk rock was born under the threat of mutually assured destruction.

Punk rock was part of a sub-culture that included comic books and bad movies. And in contrast to the conduit that the internet gives to making sure sub-cultures reach everyone interested today, back in 1985 sub-cultures were both more tightly-knit and harder to find and join. I had few people with which to discuss the paltry few comic books I read. I had few people with which to pick apart the lyrics to a song by the Clash or Bad Religion. I had to come to my own conclusions, by and large, about what, exactly, Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons were outlining in their 12-issue limited series “Watchmen”.

I didn’t get it at first. I didn’t understand that the characters of Ozymandias, Rorschach and Dr. Manhattan were created out of whole cloth, with a complete backstory (there were previous versions of Nite Owl and Silk Spectre). I didn’t see the depth that the Tales of the Black Freighter, a story of pirates and survival at sea, gave to the main story of the Mask Killer.

But I did understand the alienation of John “Dr. Manhattan” Osterman, a man who was given nearly unlimited power and found himself more and more detached from the fragile people around him. I did understand the Doomsday Clock, which gave us all a sense of how close we were to annihilation by nuclear holocaust, and its use in the comic. I did feel deeply affected by the depiction of heroes as sociopaths: the Comedian and Rorschach had their bizarre twisted ideas of right and wrong, each a viewpoint I could see in those around me. Kids I grew up with who worshipped the guns and armor used in Vietnam without understanding or caring about the human cost of the same. Cops who saw evil and crime everywhere but never looked at how far into criminality they themselves descended. I saw the point of asking who polices the policemen; how do we hold accountable those who we entrust with our safety so that we can remain free?

And, of course, the madness of trying to win a nuclear war.

Who the Hell were these people? Were they really the same species as me? Yes, I often felt anger and disillusionment, but it nearly always turned inward. If I were faced with a Darth Vader, a dark father intent on corrupting me, I would respond as Luke Skywalker did in “The Empire Strikes Back” and fall to my doom rather than fight back. Protecting myself by wiping myself out, and fuck all y’all; you’re on your own.

I had no goals, I could see no future, beyond hoping I was still around next week, next month, next year.

I read every issue of Watchmen while standing in the 7-11 near my house. Standing in front of a wire rack in a convenience store, plate glass in front of me showing the ebb and tide of cars and customers in and out of the parking lot and the flow of traffic on the street beyond, hearing the bells and beeps of the video games and pinball machines off in the corner, and needing the brief escape from the emptiness of the rest of my life.

Yesterday I sat in a theater, beside my best friend from those days, and watched Zak Snyder’s adaptation of “Watchmen”. Many were the moments I remembered the kid I used to be; the feeling of the paper beneath my fingers, the look of four-color printing showing earlier versions of the scenes digitally projected onto the screen in front of me. I had not read the books in years, many years, and yet Snyder’s faithfulness to the comic’s words and images meant many small nostalgic moments during the 163 minute film’s run.

I want to know if anyone whose experience doesn’t include the hopelessness of living under threat of the entire world coming to an end can feel the same thing I felt watching the movie and recalling that I and everyone I know and everyone else might die due to the insanity of my government’s idea of defense. I want to know if anyone who didn’t try to escape entirely into a fantasy world, learning the ins and outs of costumed heroes and Jedi Knights and paladins and rangers and rogues, can feel what I feel when seeing those fantasies being portrayed by living human beings. Is that possible?

Are these feelings I have… nostalgia? That’s what I felt when watching “Watchmen”. So lost I was, and the world was, then.

Not sure we’ve come very far since then, either.

Impact

Markos Moulitsas Zuniga and Jerome Armstrong at Powell’s

Surprisingly contentious crowd – “third party” questions come up a lot

Markos is asked about building blog traffic – “You, blogging to your immediate friends and family have a much larger impact then I do, blogging to millions.”

I’d never thought of it before in that way. My family all reads my blog, but probably only my dad has ever heard of DailyKos or MyDD. My sister and brother-in-law have never heard of Kos at all. Out of my friends, only Ken really reads political blogs – OK, he rarely reads my blog, too, but since we agree on politics that’s OK. 🙂 I can motivate my friends to participate when needed, especially my non-political friends because I know the issues they care about, and I only ask them to participate when it’s something that they would see as important. So there’s trust – I’m not just blindly asking them to send money or call all the time, like they’re an ATM or robo-caller.

Bug Man gone

Holy crab!

An article about the corrupt management at the county in the local paper

AND

Tom DeLay weaseling out of facing the voters?

Good things are supposed to come in threes.

If I get any more good news today I might…

Damn, I got nothin’. I just can’t be that lucky.

Update 4:14 PM – I’m adding this (image stolen from Duncan Black, who probably stole it from someone else found it somewhere else), mainly for Tracy, who actually made me do the Snoopy dance earlier today when she didn’t know what I was talking about:

So hot right now

Political update:

I know, I know, the Abramoff scandal just grows and grows. It’s hard to keep track of it all. But guess who just stepped forward with new information?

The Malasian Prime Minister!

And, even now, the plot is brewing to silence him…

“Now do as you are trained, Derek – and kill the Malaysian Prime Minister!

The 50-State Strategy

Several of the leading voices of the left-leaning blogosphere, along with the chair of the Democratic National Committee, Howard Dean, are pushing for a 50-state strategy in 2006. The basic idea is to have every single race, in every district and state, have at least one Democratic challenger.

To that end, Chris Bowers over at MyDD has put together a list of every House district that still needs to find someone to run on the Democratic ticket. Sadly, at least one district will not have a Democratic candidate; the 11th Congressional District of Texas. No one filed there before the deadline. But there’s still a chance to have someone challenge the incumbent Republicans in 27 districts.

That being said, one of those districts is in my home state: the 2nd district of Oregon, currently represented by Greg Walden, a Republican. OR-02 covers a huge amount of geography, known to us Portlanders as “Eastern Oregon”, basically, although Josephine, Jackson and Klamath counties are more Southern Oregon, and Hood River county is only barely east.

The filing deadline for the Oregon primary election is 7 March 2006; the primary will be held 16 May 2006.

I would like to do my part in trying to find someone to run on the Democratic ticket against Rep. Walden. Unfortunately, I don’t live in that district or I would just sign up myself (not that I’d have a chance of winning, mind you; but just to have someone on the ballot).

The reason I’m posting this is: if there’s anyone out there that lives in OR-02, or could move there by the filing deadline, and is even remotely interested in getting involved in national politics, now is your chance. Don’t contact me; I’m just a messenger. Get yourself the forms and paperwork and get involved now. The Republicans are the party of corruption and bad governance; we need opposition if we want American democracy to survive and recover.

Thanks for listening.

New Orleans Katrina roundup

While the damage done by Hurricane Katrina has mainly fallen off the viewscreens of the traditional media, there are still folk trying to convey what has happened to the Big Easy. Mainly, they’re bloggers. It breaks my heart, and, yes, I still donate to causes that support victims of Katrina and rebuilding in New Orleans. It’s difficult to find credible charities that aren’t just fronts for Haliburton, though, but one that I feel comfortable donating to is Habitat for Humanity.

Here they describe their efforts to aid folks on the Gulf Coast.

And NPR’s “All Things Considered” did a story on a benefit CD of music recorded after Katrina hit (thanks to a new friend, Lisa, for the link) called Our New Orleans, all by local musicians – proceeds from the sale of that album also go to Habitat for Humanity. Click on the link in the upper-right hand corner of the above-linked page, or you can purchase the CD from Amazon. (I’m not an affiliate; I don’t get any kickback if you use that link.)

Also, the Rude Pundit has been visiting New Orleans, a town he spent some time in in the past, and reporting back with an insiders view on what is going on there. The things he sees and reports to are not pretty but worth listening to. He offers no solutions, only information.

Make no mistake; the Rude One is, well, rude. Some would say vulgar and offensive. But it’s the anger of a cynic who has seen his ideals stomped on, repeatedly.

The report, “Katrina Plus Four Months” is in five parts:

  1. Part One
  2. Part Two
  3. Part Three
  4. Part Four
  5. Part Five

Shorter Bush’s speech

Shorter version of President Bush’s speech tonight:

“Remember, your sons and daughters in Afghanistan and Iraq are still under my control… so don’t get any funny thoughts about impeachment…”

.