Sagan, sharing

This clip, from “Cosmos: A Personal Voyage”, Carl Sagan’s amazing series, still makes me weep at what was lost.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MsF8JhkRIk]

Not the loss of Sagan himself, although that is part of it. But the loss of knowledge, and history that he is speaking about.

I know that knowledge of the roots of Christianity will not sway modern-day Christians, but how can anyone hear of Cyril’s conflicts with Hypatia, and the later destruction of the Library of Alexandria and not feel the lesser for supporting “faith” over reason?

It seems to me that Christianity, like the other fundamentalist religions, are only supported in the present, by denying their past.

God as the machine

Carl Sagan said, on the topic of religion:

“The idea that God is an oversized white male with a flowing beard who sits in the sky and tallies the fall of every sparrow is ludicrous. But if by God one means the set of physical laws that govern the universe, then clearly there is such a God. This God is emotionally unsatisfying… it does not make much sense to pray to the law of gravity.”

From this page, #7, and widely reproduced across the internets, although I cannot find a proper reference for it. I’ll update this post once I do.

Carl Sagan and me

My first post on Carl Sagan today will be a listing of all the memories I had of him.

When I was a kid, like many kids, I suppose, I read comic books and sci-fi books and books about UFOs or Bigfoot. From those, I learned a little science, most of it junk science, but there was still a certain vocabulary, a certain mindset, that came out, even in those fictional, flawed ways. Over and over again, I read about The Scientific Method, almost always capitalized, and presented as the basis for all rational thought. The idea of a Method for doing amazing things, making weapons for any foe, ships and equipment for exploration, or machines for helping feed, shelter and entertain all humans, appealed to me. It was a way to organize the world; it was a way to separate fact from fiction; it was a guide for creativity and a spur for adventure.

As I learned more, though, I began to see a difference between the things I saw on TV that were real, and really happening, like the Apollo missions to the Moon (with which I shared a last name), and the almost-magical creature supposedly living in the bottom of a deep, dark Scottish loch, or the black-eyed, large-headed, spindly-armed alien Grays.

Reading science fiction authors like Arthur C. Clarke and Isaac Asimov led me to read those authors’ non-fiction essays and stories. Asimov, in particular, wrote on nearly every topic, from humor, to the Bible and Shakespeare, to lasers and physics and chemistry.

And since I always wanted more to read, once I started browsing in the Popular Science section of the library and bookstores, I saw another name: Carl Sagan.

I believe that the first strictly non-fiction science book I bought with my allowance was “The Dragons of Eden” by Carl Sagan. It strictly explored the idea of intelligence, from a scientific, and not mystical, point of view. Dr. Sagan discussed the many weird and non-intuitive things that happen when the brain is damaged; people lose the ability to recognize human faces, for example, but otherwise can function normally. Or they become unable to speak the names of objects, but can gesture to the words themselves, or pick up a similar item, demonstrating that they know what it is – but something in them is unable to speak the words.

It was my first exposure to the idea that the brain really is the “mind” – that our personalities aren’t some immaterial substance that is magically immortal, but a process that arises out of the functioning of our physical bodies.

That book, and Dr. Sagan’s gentle and patient educational tone, also began to show me how the Scientific Method was applied to the actual, dirty, messy, chaotic world. Sagan, unlike Asimov and Clarke, weren’t just writers who spoke a scientific language. Sagan was a scientist first, and an author last.

More than that, he was a Rocket Scientist.

When I went to find more books by him and learn more about him, I found that Sagan worked for NASA, the very essence of applied science to me. He had helped to design and launch probes to the other worlds in our solar system: Viking 1 & 2, Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11, and Voyager 1 and 2, probes that were millions of miles from Earth, sending back pictures and data about the asteroids, Jupiter, and Saturn and all their little moons.

I watched and absorbed every episode of Cosmos: A Personal Voyage, hosted by Carl Sagan, on local channel 10, in 1980. I knew that the special effects were cheesy and even lame, no match for “Star Wars” or their ilk, but I also knew that “Cosmos” was talking about real things, and that made all the difference in the world.

I remember, when I was in high school, going to OMSI, Portland’s science museum, back when it was up on the hill by the Zoo, with a friend, Jeff Schenk. I don’t remember which one, but one of the Voyager probes was set to send pictures back from Saturn, the ringed planet. My friend and I were going to OMSI to see the pictures, “live”. There were several rooms set up at OMSI, with big-screen projection TVs, that were connected via satellite to NASA, showing image after image of Saturn and it’s many moons. This must have been in 1981. I remember that Carl Sagan was one of many voices and faces explaining in detail what we were seeing, and again, his playful voice showed the joy of discovery, of real discovery and exploration. All of us in that room, and everyone across the nation and around the world watching those images were seeing things that had never been seen before by anyone else, and all because of a machine built by human hands. Carl Sagan was greedy for knowledge, like any scientist, as were we all; but he didn’t hoard the knowledge. He wanted to share it with everyone.

That little space robot, controlled from millions of miles away, had travelled farther than Leif Ericson, Magellan, and Lewis and Clark combined and many times over, but the people who built and launched it were no less of explorers than those early sailors and travelers. And for me, at that moment, Carl Sagan was the voice and face for them.

Carl Sagan led me to understand what it is to be a skeptic, when he talked about the reality of searching for extra-terrestrial intelligence, as contrasted with the stories of alien abductions and saucer-shaped flying vehicles. He led me to wonder about the self-destructive impulse in humanity, when he talked about the possibility of nuclear war causing an all-too-real nuclear winter.

He even demonstrated, by example, the honor in admitting one’s own mistakes, when he publicly listed the errors he had made in his lifetime, including a prediction he had made during the first Gulf War. He had claimed, on national TV, that the oil fires burning in Kuwait would cause a chilling effect that would be global and catastrophic. It takes a real man, in my view, to admit one is wrong. The world would be a better place if more people could do the same.

I believe I’ve read every book that Carl Sagan has written; and he has written several, but not enough, never enough. Because, in December 1996, just 10 short years ago, Carl Sagan died. Death is not easy to deal with for people, and there are as many ways of coming to terms with death as there are cultures and people. It is not a surprise to me that many people try to deny death and believe in a literal immortality for themselves and the ones they love.

It can be difficult to realize that everything that made Carl Sagan the towering intellect, gentle teacher to humanity, and stubborn explorer of the universe that he was, disappeared from the Cosmos 10 years ago today. He left behind words, and pictures, and work; he left behind a family, and children. But he, himself, is gone, never to reoccur. I am glad that I got to know who he was during his lifetime. I am glad that I became the person I am today in some part because of who he was, even though he and I never met.

I’m glad that the Cosmos still produces people like Carl Sagan. May it continue to produce intelligences of such caliber for a long, long time.

Carl Sagan was my hero

Tomorrow is the 10th anniversary of Carl Sagan’s death.

Joel Schlossberg has proposed a Blog-a-thon to celebrate Carl Sagan’s life and beliefs.

The Blog-a-thon has the approval of Nick Sagan, Carl’s son. Not that that is why I’m participating tomorrow.

I just think that Carl Sagan was one of my earliest real-life heroes.

Funny how most of my heroes are scientists, thinkers, philosophers, dreamers, and authors. Yes, they are almost always all of those in the same person. Do you find that surprising? The stereotype of scientists is that they’re socially-awkward, inept at communication except on the most technical level, and shallow, materialistic people.

And yet I find the amazing awestruck writings of my heroes to be deeply moving and heartfelt. All the more so because the things of which they write are grounded in things we can actually observe, measure, and predict.

It does not destroy the beauty of the rainbow to know how it comes about.

Plus, if these guys are so socially inept, why do they marry hot wives? Richard Dawkin’s wife, Lalla Ward, actress? Carl Sagan’s wife, Ann Druyan? Rowr. Chicks dig the big brains, baby.

Tracy, when I mentioned the Blog-a-Thon to her, said that she had no idea who Carl Sagan was.

Join me tomorrow as I turn my meager skills towards explaining that for her, and anyone else who wants to know.

PS: Ix-nay on the “Billions and billions” comments. C’mon. He never said that.

I never said it. Honest. Oh, I said there are maybe 100 billion galaxies and 10 billion trillion stars. It’s hard to talk about the Cosmos without using big numbers. I said ‘billion’ many times on the Cosmos television series, which was seen by a great many people. But I never said ‘billions and billions.’ For one thing, it’s imprecise. How many billions are ‘billions and billions’? A few billion? Twenty billion? A hundred billion? ‘Billions and billions’ is pretty vague… For a while, out of childish pique, I wouldn’t utter the phrase, even when asked to. But I’ve gotten over that. So, for the record, here it goes: ‘Billions and billions.'”

Presumptions

In an interesting (to me) discussion over at Jack Bog’s place, a commenter named “Sheef” posted the following:

The Blogtown post raises an interesting hypothetical. Imagine an industrious blogger nobly opining away at a local coffee shop on a laptop. A thief snatches the laptop and bolts out the door. A cop witnesses the theft and gives chase, but returns to the coffee shop empty handed. The cop tells the blogger, “I’m sorry, but the only way I could have stopped him was by pushing him down, and he could have been hurt. So he got away.”

Does the blogger:

a. Commend the cop for his restraint – it was only a laptop, after all;

b. Commend the cop for his restraint and, upon obtaining a replacement laptop, blog about the virtue of PDX cops;

c. Scream epithets at the cop for not shoving the thief down and stomping on his head in order to get the laptop back; or

d. Throw scalding espresso into the cop’s eyes while screaming epithets and, upon obtaining a replacement laptop, blog incessantly about the lazy PDX police who have no respect for private property?

Discuss.

Note: “The Blogtown post” that Sheef refers to can be found here.

Just taking the question at face value, without considering the presumptions Sheef may be making, is a bit difficult for me. I think that Sheef was trying to personalize the situation being discussed (a police officer injured in the line of duty while chasing down a suspect). If I can guess from Sheef’s tone, I think he may be assuming that I, or another commenter, would call for a different response from the cop for “someone else”, versus the response I (or another person) would call for myself (or themselves). I could be wrong, though, and I hope to hear from Sheef, or that he at least reads my post.

Obviously I had a first, gut reaction to Sheef’s post. But then I thought about it some more, carefully considered my underlying assumptions, and then realized (or, possibly, rationalized) my initial reaction was the correct one for me.

The answer, for me, both on first reaction and after considered thought, is B. I would thank the cop for his effort and commend him on his restraint, and upon getting to another computer, I would probably blog about it. I blog about everything else, after all…

My reasons for this are several, and just taking the situation as Sheef presents it without adding any new assumptions, the basics for me start with the fact that no laptop is worth someone, cop or thief, getting injured over it; and end with the fact that, in my view of police work, they serve the public, including some guy who snatched a laptop off a table. I’m just as uncomfortable with the idea of a cop who views a property theft as an excuse for violence, as I am with the assumption that I see in Sheef’s question that a suspect “deserves” a little roughing up.

You can argue that if the cop saw the guy take my laptop, that the suspect’s guilt is not a question. But I would argue that it’s not the cop’s place to make that determination. Our system of justice separates the judgement of guilt from those who enact the laws for a reason, and I see no reason to question that.

And to add a bit to the question (my assumption that Sheef was trying to personalize the situation, so bear with me while I picture myself in the scenario, with all that that entails), since my laptop is an Apple MacBook Pro, my chances of getting it back in one piece are greater if I report it stolen, the thief takes it, sells it for quick cash, and it eventually turns up in an Apple Store for service.

Compare that scenario with the idea of a cop knocking the suspect to the ground. What are the odds a fragile laptop is going to survive that?

Granted, that comparison might not hold for any other crap laptop (heh)… which is why I considered that separately from the basic, no-added-assumptions question. Just sayin’.

Giveaway

I headed downtown this morning to do a little Christmas shopping. Hadn’t had breakfast yet, so I stopped in at Starbucks.

Mmm… soy chai. So good. I’m all high-maintenance-y, I order mine without water or foam. No water means it’s got a stronger flavor. No foam means they fill the damn cup all the way up.

And even though it was after 10:00 AM, they still had some of their delicious cinnamon rolls in the case… Cinnamon rolls as big as your head, and filled with five hundred and twenty delicious cinnamon flavored calories.

I couldn’t resist. I bought one. But I had them cut it in half, to help me only eat half.

Tracy asked me, via text, what I was going to do with the other half. I said I was probably going to throw it away, to be rid of the temptation.

She suggested I give it to a bum. Good idea! And so seasonal!

So I headed out onto the streets of downtown, half a cinnamon roll in a box in my hand.

First guy was laying on the sidewalk out in front of the Rite-Aid, with a sign asking for money to go somewhere. He didn’t want it, he said, rubbing his belly, and smiling with only a few teeth in his mouth, saying that he’d eaten a big full dinner the night before and this morning, so he didn’t want it. Um, OK.

Next was a woman, dressed in about fifteen layers of clothing, all of the layers unwashed. She didn’t want it, she said, because “I’ve got heartburn.” All-right-y then.

Next was an unshaven guy whose face looked gray, to match his clothes. He just said, “No, thank you” in a polite but gravelly tone.

So I threw it away. At least I tried, right?

Bugs

I finally tried the free MetroFi wireless internets. I was at the Taco del Mar on SE Stark and MLK.

I chose a seat near the window, and even with line of sight to the antenna outside, I could not get a signal. Then I moved about 5 feet closer (but still inside) and suddenly got the MetroFi Free, MetroFi Premium, and one other signal (I forget but not MetroFi or PTP – probably just some random access point in the area).

I was using my MacBook Pro, and Safari, on Mac OS X 10.4.

I was able, at first, to send email using my normal mail program, so it did not appear that port 25 (in tech-y speak) was blocked.

In my brief experiment in surfing, I only saw banner ads on about half the pages I hit. I had thought banner ads would be on all the pages?

Some sites (like Blue Oregon or Jack Bog’s blog) loaded normally, except with the added banner ad sometimes. But on sites where the comments are displayed in a pop-up window – the pop-up window would load AND the main page would load the comments, too. Annoying.

And a health-related site I use, Calorie Count (I was trying to enter my calories for lunch) just kept refreshing over and over again, making the page unusable.

Meh. If there’s nothing else around, I can use it for a quick look-up. But I’m not going to go out of my way to look at their dumb ads.

ALL

Tracy and I were talking, via text, at work. Then I got busy with some other things and couldn’t respond to Tracy. Tracy kept sending me more and more worried texts, wondering why I’d stopped talking to her.

After I was done, I explained that I had been on a call, and emailing someone else, and I apologized for not being able to talk.

Tracy responded: It’s all in my head, Brian. We’ve gone over that already. But, I appreciate you spelling it out for me. That’s EXACTLY what I need right now. More than you know. Thanks for being you, as always.

I replied: It can’t all be in your head. Because it’s all in MY head.

Tracy: Really?

Me: Duh. It can’t ALL be in BOTH heads, now, can it?

Tracy: I’m pretty sure it’s ALL in MY head, Brian. Just sayin’.

Me: I’m so blobbing this.

Responsibility

Yesterday, Microsoft announced updates for Office 2004 and Office vX. The updates also apparently showed up in AutoUpdate.

Today, Microsoft announced that everyone who got a notice of an Office update and installed it… didn’t REALLY. The updates were posted in error. There’s no actual updates. So everyone who saw the updates show up in AutoUpdate, or downloaded them from the Microsoft website via the above links that no longer work can just uninstall them.

Later today, Microsoft confirmed that, sorry, there’s no way to uninstall an Office update. So the part of the notice that says “uninstall them” is a mistake.

Later than the previous confirmation of the previous notice about the previous updates, Microsoft announced that those responsible for the unintentional posting of the security updates for Office have been sacked.

Shortly after the announcement about the sacking of those responsible for the previous unintentional posting of the security updates for Office, Microsoft stated that there were no sackings, as that would be considered “responsibility” (albeit at a very low level) and that announcing that there were sackings, was a mistake.