Do you know all the words?

I love Schoolhouse Rock even more today than I did when I was a kid.

Do you know all the words to the Preamble to the Constitution? I do. And I tend to sing it, just as it’s sung in this song:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_TXJRZ4CFc&hl=en]

We, the People,
In order to form a more perfect union,
establish justice
ensure domestic tran-quil-i-tee hee-ee-ee,
provide for the common defense
promote the general welfare, an-nd
secure the blessings of liber-ty
to ourselves and our posteri-ty,

Do ordain and establish
this Constitution
Forrrrrr
The United State of
Am-er-i-caaaaa!!

“Right On!” indeed.

Spinning

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZYuRk1pFO0&hl=en]

…OK, now I want to try that. Off to the mall!

What I won’t trade for trust

“Whoo! Yeah, sexy! How you doin’?”

I turned my head to the right as I walked home. From the sidewalk I could see the woman who had just called out to me. She sat in a lawn chair along with several others, visible in the back yard of a house in my neighborhood.

Yes, she was looking at me.

“And whatcha got in that bag?” she yelled out again.

I kept walking.

I had donuts in the bag.

Everything is on the internet

Sure, you’ve heard of imdb, the Internet Movie Database.

But have you ever heard of imFdb? The Internet Movie Firearms Database?

See, the “F” stands for “Firearms”.

If you ever watched a movie and thought, “hey, what kind of gun did Rambo use?” this would be your first best resource. Unlike, say, the bajillions of other sites that would come up in a Google search, the imfdb focuses on guns.

Things I learned this week 4

Holy crab I learned a lot this week!

My letter to Bill Burton, spokesman for the Obama ’08 Campaign

Mr. Burton:

Back in October, you stated, as a spokesman for the Senator, in simple, clear terms that Barack Obama would support a filibuster of any bill that contained retroactive immunity for the telecommunication companies that broke the law at the President’s urging.

Yesterday Barack Obama went back on that promise, by backing away and saying he would “work in the Senate to remove this provision so that we can seek full accountability for past offenses”.

That is not enough and it does not fulfill the promise you made on behalf of Senator Obama’s presidential campaign.

Many people are watching this bill, and are continuing to take action to prevent it from becoming signed in to law by the least popular President in the history of polling. I, as do many others, understand that the retroactive immunity contained in the bill is just one of many provisions that are damaging to the core principles of our Constitution and specifically the Fourth Amendment. The bill enacts and makes legal many of the illegal practices the Bush Administration began in 2001, prior to the attacks on American soil on September 11th, putting the lie to the idea that forgoing the protections and freedoms guaranteed in our country is necessary to keep us safe. If President Bush’s illegal wiretapping did not prevent the horror of the attacks on that fateful day, why is the Democratic leadership joining with the Republicans to retroactively enable them?

As an Obama supporter, I am holding the Senator to his promise, and I will urge my friends and family to do so as well.

*****
NOTE: If you agree with me that Senator Obama should keep his promise and stand up for our civil liberties, email Mr. Burton, or use the phone number listed at MoveOn and follow up to let MoveOn know what response, if any, you received.

My letter to Senator Ron Wyden

The FISA re-write passed by the House today (against the objections of a majority of the Democratic caucus) is not a “compromise” at all.

The “exclusivity” clause in Title I, which Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Hoyer both claimed were strong counters, are no stronger than the exclusivity clause that President Bush ignored in the previous version of FISA, a clause wiped away with a simple secret memo from John Woo. President Bush felt free to ignore the law before; why would he care now, when he is a lame duck?

The granting of retroactive immunity enshrines into law the shocking Nixonian claim “if the President says so, it is not illegal” and finally establishes the telecommunications corporations just as much above the law as the Bush Administration, to the detriment of our democracy and our Constitution.

Senator Obama stated today his opposition to the retroactive immunity portion of the bill, but would only go so far as to suggest trying to remove that portion. Because he is the nominal head of the Democratic Party, I cannot believe that this bill did not come to pass without either his direct involvement, or at least his blessing. Perhaps he wishes to make use of it’s many provisions for collecting “intelligence” on American citizens… or his own political enemies… in addition to those who see America as a threat to themselves. I support Senator Obama in his bid for the Presidency, but I do not wish him to be a monarch; I wish him to be a President of a democratic (small “d”) republic. Perhaps Sen. Obama is under the mistaken belief, as Speaker Pelosi, Majority Leader Hoyer, and Senate Majority Leader Reid seem to be, that giving the White House and Republicans in Congress more than they wanted in intelligence gathering is “bipartisan compromise” is seen by American voters as “being strong”.

Not so, Senator Wyden. Not so.

Perhaps you can have the courage to put the Constitution and the country ahead of party and politics. Perhaps you can step up and prevent this erosion of our rights. Perhaps you can take action that other more fearful (or calculating) politicians seem unable to do.

A simple “hold” can stop this bill in its tracks. A fillibuster can derail it. Do not give cover to those who broke the law. Do not allow the most unpopular president in history any victory at all.

Many are paying attention to this matter, including myself. Markos Moulitsas Zuniga is paying attention. Glenn Greenwald is paying attention. The ACLU is paying attention. And we are all working to elect more and better Democrats. Be the kind of Democratic Senator the majority wish to see.

Majority Leader Hoyer

I sent the following email this morning to House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer:

I’m paying attention. So many others are paying attention, too. Markos Moulitsas Zuniga is paying attention. Glenn Greenwald is paying attention. The ACLU is paying attention. And citizens on the right are paying attention, as well.

Allowing the law-breaking telecoms to get off scott-free for their crimes (why would they need amnesty unless they committed crimes?) is not what the American public hungers for. Allowing the extremely unpopular Bush Administration to escape accountability is not what America desires. Allowing any president, whether Democratic or Republican, unlimited power to spy on citizens is not freedom.

Money is being raised specifically to educate voters in your district, Majority Leader Hoyer. Hope you’ve enjoyed your political career.

It sounds threatening, doesn’t it? I’m kinda mad about the whole thing, I guess. But I’m just threatening him with voting him out of office, at most. Like Kos said:

We kicked Joe Lieberman out of the caucus. We got rid of Al Wynn this year. Those were test runs, so to speak. We’ve got a lot more of that ready to unleash in 2010.

More and better Democrats, both. Let’s make sure our government reflects the values of the majority for once.